Third Quarter Collapse: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





Off-Day Open Thread: J.J. Redick Madness!

J.J. Redick of the Orlando Magic poses for a portrait.
3QC is J.J.'s website. I just write on it.
File photo by Thearon Henderson, Getty Images

Remember when I linked to Mavs Moneyball's comprehensive rundown of the Jason Kidd trade? Well, I'm trying my hand at similarly covering J.J. Redick's season. 3QC user Brutalfacts wrote in this comment that he's "sick and tired of JJ, JJ talk, JJ speculation, discussion of JJ's future, JJ's whining about his 'role' and at this point just about everything JJ related." Sorry, Brutalfacts.

Note that some of the links in the 3QC stories below may have rotted. John Denton's forum automatically deletes threads after a certain amount of time has elapsed; ditto with the Orlando Sentinel's stories.

And without further ado...

So, what do you guys think about J.J.? Does he deserve a spot in the rotation? Does he have a future with this team? Did Otis Smith make a mistake in drafting him? Make yourself heard in the comments.

0 recs | Comment 19 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

When you put it like that..

Hey, love the open thread Idea!

I am not a big Redick fan per se. I never liked Duke and was glad when Redick's team lost in the tourney. That being said, I think the guy is a legit talent in this league. Just looking at players like Gibson, Korver, Kapono, and yes, even Gordon give me an inkling of how good Redick can be. Then, just as Gordon seperates himself from that group with his mobility, bringing to mind other players like Miller and Hampton, you can really begin to appreciate just how good Redick can be.

As for being in the rotation; not this year. The Bogans/Evans combo is playing too good to break up at this point. I really do hope that he gets his chance next year though. Hopefully we can get a legit 2 guard and he can back him up. Be our sixth man and thrive.

And finally, great pick by Otis. I like the direction he took this team after hiring SVG and don't blame him too much for JJ not fitting in up to this point. That has worked out to the Magic's fortune.

by Eyriq the Red on Mar 7, 2008 8:54 AM EST   0 recs

Re: When you put it like that..

Hey, love the open thread Idea!

Thanks. I'm trying to improve 3QC, and I figured the once-or-twice-weekly open thread would keep things moving.

That being said, I think the guy is a legit talent in this league. Just looking at players like Gibson, Korver, Kapono, and yes, even Gordon give me an inkling of how good Redick can be.

Pretty solid comparisons. I think of the guys you mentioned, Korver is the most similar to Redick. And Redick is further along than Korver was at age 23, when he averaged 12.7 points per 36 minutes on 42% shooting; Redick is averaging 16.5 points per 36 minutes on 44% shooting. So it's entirely possible that he could develop into a solid contributor along those lines. Then again, he could also be the next Brooks Thompson. We won't know until he cracks the rotation.

As for being in the rotation; not this year. The Bogans/Evans combo is playing too good to break up at this point. I really do hope that he gets his chance next year though.

Agreed.

And finally, great pick by Otis. I like the direction he took this team after hiring SVG and don't blame him too much for JJ not fitting in up to this point. That has worked out to the Magic's fortune.

I think Ronnie Brewer would have been a better pick because he can drive to the basket a bit better. It's hard to call the pick good or bad either way because J.J. hasn't really gotten a chance. But as it stands, the past several drafts have been wasted.

by Ben Q Rock on Mar 7, 2008 10:09 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Enigma of Redick

I think the frustration being expressed regarding hearing about Redick by some fans is just misplaced frustration about our terrible drafts.  Redick, most agree, has the potential to be a good NBA player.  However, he doesn't fit well with SVG's philosophy, so he hardly plays.  

Redick belongs on a team where they need shooting.  SVG seems to feel that Rashard and Hedo are enough, as long as the "mogans" combo shoots ok, and plays better defense than Redick.  The thing is, we haven't really had good defensive play from any position but maybe center all season.  You would think that Redick can't really do any worse for our defense.  If we had a legit power forward to go with Dwight, Redick would do fine as a team defender because he has a high basketball IQ.  Physical limitations in terms of quickness can be overcome on the team level as long as you have a tough shot blocking presence at the rim.  A legit rebounding power forward would let Dwight be more of a shot blocking presence, which would improve perimeter defense through synergy.  Most good defensive teams have this as a cornerstone.  

However, since SVG doesn't seem to agree with most similar assessments of Redick, it doesn't make sense to keep him on the end of the bench when he can be an asset for us in trade.  I understand the guy's frustration, because he's been riding the end of the bench for a long time when he could be contributing on a team whose system and philosophy match up.  However, I honestly think Otis is just playing hardball when it comes to trading him.  Likely teams are making really weak offers for him, hoping to get a potential something for nothing. It makes sense that Otis would pitch him as a valuable asset to get better offers.  Redick really just needs to be smart and shut up, so Otis can have a good bargaining position to find the right kind of deal for us.

-D

by swamidigital on Mar 7, 2008 12:34 PM EST   0 recs

Re: Enigma of Redick

Redick belongs on a team where they need shooting.  SVG seems to feel that Rashard and Hedo are enough, as long as the "mogans" combo shoots ok, and plays better defense than Redick.  The thing is, we haven't really had good defensive play from any position but maybe center all season.  You would think that Redick can't really do any worse for our defense

I disagree. Bogans and Evans do an admirable job of keeping their men away from the basket. Kobe Bryant may have scored 8 points in the 4th quarter of that one win over us last month, but Bogans was up in his face the whole time and forced him to shoot just 2-of-6 from the field. Redick is a huge step down defensively.

A legit rebounding power forward would let Dwight be more of a shot blocking presence, which would improve perimeter defense through synergy.  Most good defensive teams have this as a cornerstone.

Yup.

However, since SVG doesn't seem to agree with most similar assessments of Redick, it doesn't make sense to keep him on the end of the bench when he can be an asset for us in trade.

If the right offer comes along, Otis will pull the trigger. Otis may be committed to J.J., but it doesn't appear as though Stan is, and Stan's the boss. And it makes complete sense to trade J.J. Why keep a guy who doesn't play because when you can exchange him for one who will?

by Ben Q Rock on Mar 7, 2008 10:14 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

JJ is da man!
JJ is the second coming of the mesiah!  He needs to be our starting 2 guard playing 35 mins a night! He could easily and I mean easily avgerage 15 pts 5 rebs and 5 asts a night!

by milesxxx on Mar 7, 2008 12:41 PM EST   0 recs

Re: JJ is da man!

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, but okay. J.J. may get to 15-point, 3-assist territory, but he's never going to average more than a board or two per game. That's the weakest part of his game. Well, that and defense.

Writing that last sentence made it abundantly clear to my why J.J. isn't playing.

by Ben Q Rock on Mar 7, 2008 10:16 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

All JJ...all the time-hope he likes the attention

Lets see if we can pick these off one at a time....

Does JJ deserve a spot in the rotation??

I say no, not as this team is constructed.  JJ is a one-dimensional player, a shooter on a team full of shooters.  Evans and Bogans both bring more to the table defensively, Evans has a real knack for getting to the basket, both are serviceable shooterers, are far more physical than JJ (who is the poster boy for finesse).  Can someone tell me what JJ brings to the table that improves this team, or an intangible that the other SG’s lack (don’t tell me about shooting....I repeat...JJ is a one dimensional shooter on a team full of shooters)?  Rugged defense?  Don’t think so.  Size?  Can he create his own shot?  I cannot find a single reason JJ should be in the rotation ahead of other SG on this team.

As for JJ’s history...just cause a staff writer says JJ had a great practice, or is going to get minutes, or that rumors abound that JJ is getting traded or any other speculation is meaningless.  Writers write, throw stuff at the wall, fill newspaper space, and usually get it wrong.  Again I ask for one part of JJ’s game that puts him the rotation over the players ahead ahead of him?

Was he a wasted draft pick?  Should we all howl at Otis for being stupid?  While it’s a nice distraction (you know, your team us up by almost 10 games in their division, are playing better all the time, has a very bright future, but we fans need to bitch about stuff...Otis has to pay) I don’t think we can lay this at Otis’s feet alone.  JJ was probably overrated coming into the league, was hurt coming into his rookie season, the team was in flux coming off the stellar Johnny Davis year and giving the job to Brian Hill to buy time with the fan base to get support for the arena, develop Dwight Howard and clear cap space.  I can name many players who probably would a better pick but the Magic took their shot with JJ for probably reasonably good reasons at the time.  The Magic had bigger issues that Redick, and given the situation we found ourselves at the time least JJ had some possible marquee value.

The last chapter of the JJ saga also has not been written yet, its too early to call him a wasted pick until we find out if he is playable, tradable or valuable.  We only need to look the true wasted picks and stupid acquisitions we have had to endure, (Jerald Sasser,  Doug Christy, Johnny Taylor, Brooks Thompson, and so on and so on) to see that Otis has by no measure failed in a scale his predecessors have.

We are dealing with the here and now, and at this point JJ is not a rotation player.  He needs to shut up, see how the offseason plays out, do his job, stay outta the way, quit annoying me, be a team player (did I mention shut up?).  I am sure JJ will get a shot somewhere else if it does not pan out here (like say,,,the Clippers, or the Grizz) where he put up big numbers on a very bad team if the situation here is not to his liking.

by Brutalfacts on Mar 7, 2008 5:39 PM EST   0 recs

lol, right on

I agree 100%.

Was that last paragraph a veiled threat to JJ?

by Eyriq the Red on Mar 7, 2008 7:31 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Re: All JJ...all the time-hope he likes the atten

Does JJ deserve a spot in the rotation??

I say no, not as this team is constructed.  JJ is a one-dimensional player, a shooter on a team full of shooters.  Evans and Bogans both bring more to the table defensively, Evans has a real knack for getting to the basket, both are serviceable shooterers, are far more physical than JJ (who is the poster boy for finesse).  Can someone tell me what JJ brings to the table that improves this team, or an intangible that the other SG’s lack (don’t tell me about shooting....I repeat...JJ is a one dimensional shooter on a team full of shooters)?  Rugged defense?  Don’t think so.  Size?  Can he create his own shot?  I cannot find a single reason JJ should be in the rotation ahead of other SG on this team.

I agree that he hasn't earned a spot in the rotation, but I disagree that he's one-dimensional. Lately he's shown an increased willingness to take the ball to the basket, and in the Summer League he even set the table for some of his teammates with his dribble penetration. I wish he's use that skill more in the limited minutes he gets. Too often, he's content to pump-fake from the three-point arc, take two dribbles in, and launch an off-balance shot. If we were more aggressive, he might play more often

JJ was probably overrated coming into the league, was hurt coming into his rookie season, the team was in flux coming off the stellar Johnny Davis year and giving the job to Brian Hill to buy time with the fan base to get support for the arena, develop Dwight Howard and clear cap space.  I can name many players who probably would a better pick but the Magic took their shot with JJ for probably reasonably good reasons at the time.

Interesting. I hadn't thought of the possibility that drafting a popular guy like J.J. was a move designed to distract people from the abysmal Johnny Davis era. That, in combination with the Brian Hill goodwill re-hire, really makes one wonder...

We only need to look the true wasted picks and stupid acquisitions we have had to endure, (Jerald Sasser,  Doug Christy, Johnny Taylor, Brooks Thompson, and so on and so on) to see that Otis has by no measure failed in a scale his predecessors have.

Very true, although the bar certainly isn't up very high...

We are dealing with the here and now, and at this point JJ is not a rotation player.  He needs to shut up, see how the offseason plays out, do his job, stay outta the way, quit annoying me, be a team player (did I mention shut up?).  I am sure JJ will get a shot somewhere else if it does not pan out here (like say,,,the Clippers, or the Grizz) where he put up big numbers on a very bad team if the situation here is not to his liking.

My friend Matt (from Hardwood Paroxysm) thinks trading J.J. to the Grizzlies for Hakim Warrick makes sense for both teams, as well as J.J., and I'm inclined to agree with him.

by Ben Q Rock on Mar 7, 2008 10:23 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Yes

I would take Warrick in a heartbeat for J.J. We might as well get some talent in return for our bench warmer. Getting either a starting PF (better than Battie) or a replacement SG (who could start), are essentials. J.J. should be a goner.

by MagicManEvan on Mar 9, 2008 2:55 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Bye J.J.

I really dont think he will be here past this season. He's just too one-dimensional and there are just many better options at SG than him like Evans, Bogans, and even Dooling.

by MagicManEvan on Mar 7, 2008 8:05 PM EST   0 recs

Re: Bye J.J.

Bogans probably won't opt-out -- there's no way he's going to get more money elsewhere -- and Keyon will probably stick around. Arroyo's as good as gone, and Evans will probably want more money than we can offer him after re-signing Dooling. That'd leave Keyon as the backup point guard, Bogans as the starting two... and J.J. as the backup. But if Otis makes a trade (Redick for Warrick, for instance) we could shift Turk to the two, Rashard to the three, and have Warrick at the four. Bogans would be our sixth man.

On second thought, maybe we should keep J.J. "Keith Bogans, Sixth Man" doesn't sound too great.

by Ben Q Rock on Mar 7, 2008 10:27 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Re: to your Re:Bye J.J.

Your scenario has the Magic not using the mid on a SG, or at all for that matter, which would be a terrible blow to my hopes of Otis playing aggressive this summer. Do you really think that is the likely scenario? I mean the market is screaming great deals for the mid level this year, come and get yours, with such big names as Artest and Maggette being potential snags and others of lesser quality like Childress being out there. I think not moving on the market aggressively would be a shame. And of course still keep J.J., though trading for Hakim is a no brainer if possible.  

by Eyriq the Red on Mar 7, 2008 11:22 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Whoops

I figure we'd have to use some of the mid-level to keep Keyon, which would leave us with, well... not much else.

Josh Childress would be a dream. Hopefully, Atlanta is stupid enough to let him go.

by Ben Q Rock on Mar 7, 2008 11:31 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Re:Whoops

Correct me if I'm wrong but I think that teams can resign their own players and still use the mid level exception. So in other words even if resigning Dooling puts us over the cap, his signing would not count against the mid level exception, allowing Otis to use it independently.  

by Eyriq the Red on Mar 8, 2008 8:58 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Hrm

That might be the Bird Rights thing. If you're right, then yes, we should be able to keep Keyon and still make an addition. Cool.

by Ben Q Rock on Mar 8, 2008 12:14 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

huh

what is mid-level exception?

by Boricua on Mar 9, 2008 1:21 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Re: huh

The midlevel exception allows a team to sign a player to a contract worth the average NBA salary, even if the team is already over the salary cap or if the signing will put them over the cap. We signed Hedo Turkoglu with our midlevel exception a few summers ago.

by Ben Q Rock on Mar 9, 2008 6:27 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

=(

Do u really think arroyo is gone.....
I like him =(

by Boricua on Mar 9, 2008 1:25 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Orlando Magic.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Draft Notes...
Small
About Otis
Small
Possible Picks We Could Trade Up For
Stjohns_bridge_small
Need at Power Forward
Dodgeball-purple-cobras_small
Magic Draft Board V2
Neil_diamond_small
Great Job
Squareuserpicjpeg_small
SBN News and Notes for May 13th
Squareuserpicjpeg_small
Dwight Howard Makes All-Defensive Second Team
Squareuserpicjpeg_small
Magic/Pistons Game Four: Notes from the Stands
Serpico_small
Magic spend the night in Cincy

Post New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

Featured Poll

Poll
How seriously should the Magic pursue Clippers free-agent guard Corey Maggette?
  • As seriously as possible, even if it means trading Hedo Turkoglu and filler to Los Angeles in a sign-and-trade deal
  • Fairly seriously, as in offering the full mid-level exception, and thus losing the cap space to sign any other free-agents
  • Not seriously, as in offering only the low-level veteran's exception
  • Not at all.

  98 votes | Results

Feed Yourself with FeedBurner

Blogroll

Official Orlando Magic Sites

Official Orlando Magic Player Sites

Team-Specific Coverage

(Click on a team name to view posts about it in 3QC's archives)

League-Wide Coverage

Stats/Reference

Other Florida Sports Teams


Your Host

Squareuserpicjpeg_small Ben Q Rock

ad

Site Meter